Debates are so unfulfilling. Candidates dance around issues, and never have the time to fully respond to attacks. Well, I'd propose 2 changes:
1) Give everyone in the room a button that they can use to decide if you answered the question. If you don't get at least 50% saying yes, you don't get to answer the next question - your opponent gets a clean shot. The incentive, obviously, would be to give a clear and direct answer to the question.
2) Don't limit the time per question. Give each candidate 45 minutes to talk - total - for the entire debate. That lets them make sure that they fully explore whatever issues are most important to them. It's up to them to make sure they don't run out of time before their opponent.
Of course, most campaigns would never agree to these rules.
I've tolerated a lot of annoying ads, as have we all. The seizure inducing ads that flashed between opposite colors; the "congratulations, you are customer #100000" popups; the Netflicks pop-click ads; And those frickin' Lower My Bills ads with the dancing people, and the witches, and especially the striking cobra just about drove me nuts.
Well I've been pushed over the edge, this time, by those Skype ads. Seriously, how do any news websites expect you to read an article about apiculture in Argentina with someone making annoying faces at you in crisp, high resolution video?
Advertisers, you've lost me -- I will never again use a web browser without ad blocking software installed. I'm installing Safari AdBlock as I type. Cerf willing, I will never see another ad (except on Daily Kos and similar sites, where I've enabled ads to support their revenue stream).